They got Mark Teixeira for what?

I’ve got to hand it to the Los Angeles California Angels of Anaheim, California which is near Los Angeles.  They didn’t get the Garrett Anderson replacement that they needed, but they got something that might end up being even better for them.  And they didn’t really give up a lot.  The Braves got hosed.
In case you missed it, the LACAoACwinLA’s got Mark Teixeira from the Braves (who acquired him a mere year ago… remember this?) for Casey Kotchman and Steve Marek.  I can only scratch my head and wonder what the Braves were thinking.  Sure, Teixeira is a free agent at the end of the year, and Braves have decided to run up the white flag on this year, so they had to get something for him.  But, all of the buzz said that there were several teams in line for Mr. Teixeira’s services, and that the Braves originally wanted to get three fairly high level players in return.  They ended up with two, and I’m not at all sold on Kotchman as being high level.  Maybe I’m being a bit harsh on the Braves.  This is really only a two-month rental, so we’re not talking about a big chip to trade, but Joe Sheehan at Baseball Prospectus pointed out that he’s probably the one player left on the market (Manny Ramirez notwithstanding) that’s worth 3 wins to a team over the next few months.
It’s nice that Kotchman doesn’t strike out much, and that he even walked more than he struck out last year, but all that means is that Kotchman puts the ball in play a lot.  When he does put the ball in play, he’s a very ground ball happy hitter, with the majority of his balls kissing the grass.  When he does get the ball in the air, only about 10% of those balls leave the yard.  Kotchman’s line drive rate is a lowly 16% this year.  He does make good contact, but who needs a contact/singles hitter who shows limited power potential at first base?  Then again, the Braves aren’t exactly busting at the seams with soon-to-be-ready first base prospects, so Kotchman might just be a stopgap for a few years.  On the other hand, the Angels have Matthew Brown (25 years old, hit .326/.377/.594 at Salt Lake City), and ever the prospect Kendry Morales (25 years old, .310/.347/.482 at SLC) ready to step in.  Maybe the Braves should have asked for one of those two?  Maybe?
Steve Marek is a 24 year old right-handed pitcher at AA, who just recently moved to the pen, and it seems to have done a world of good for him.  He’s now striking out 11 per nine innings (used to be 7.5), and has a good K/BB ratio and an OPS against of .601.  Pretty good numbers, which probably project him to be a good RH reliever (dare I say “closer”?) down the road.  The Angels had another like him (Ryan Aldridge) at AA who fits the same profile, so they must have figured that Marek was a redundant part. 
But that’s it?  For the fourth-best NL first baseman by VORP (behind Berkman, Pujols, and Conor Jackson) and 29th best player by VORP in all of MLB?  With multiple teams bidding?  Something just ain’t right here.  The Braves gave up that Saltalaralphmacchio guy and some other nice pieces for Teixeira last year at this time.  It made sense at the time, and the Braves were unlucky that it didn’t work out, but this seems like a fiasco for the Braves.  Maybe the market was much softer than was reported, although the Braves still had 48 more hours to play chicken with the Angels and anyone else who was calling.  People make bad decisions on short deadlines.  Did no one in the Braves organization ever take a psychology class?
But, here’s Teixeira walking away from the Braves for a good (in the sportscaster sense of the word) first baseman and a reliever prospect.  To add insult to injury, if Tex signs elsewhere next year, the LACAoACwinLA’s get the draft picks that he will surely rate.  Is that all there is
David Cameron over at FanGraphs showed how Teixeira will benefit the Angels at the plate, at least on paper.  I looked at the OPA! numbers (my Retrosheet-compatable defensive rating system) for Teixeira and Kotchman for 2007.  Kotchman was about 6 runs better than (ahem, 2 time Gold Glove winner) Teixeira last year, but both were hovering around average for the position, with Kotchman slightly above and Tex slightly below.  The Angels take a small hit on defense, but nothing that Teixeira won’t easily make up for with his bat.  The Angels made out like a couple of high schoolers in an empty movie theatre.
The Angels are playing over their heads as far as their Pythagorean record goes (by 8-12 games, according to Baseball Prospectus’ adjusted standings), but the reality is that they are 11.5 games up on second place Texas, the A’s have already loudly surrendered, and the Mariners are on their way to losing 100 games.  The Angels simply have to coast into the playoffs this year.  Once they get there, they’re a much better team than they were 24 hours ago.  Even if they lose Teixeira at the end of the year, they have cover in the organization at first base that doesn’t look to be any worse than Kotchman.  So their net cost to load up for the playoffs was a placeholder and one AA pitching prospect.  Well played.
On a related note, be sure to tune in to MVN’s coverage of the trading deadline on Thursday, starting at 9 am Eastern, going to 4 pm.  Maybe later.


11 Responses to They got Mark Teixeira for what?

  1. Sheehan’s +3 win comment is nuts. The difference between Teixeira and Kotchman is about 2-3 wins over the course of an entire season. Over 50 games, it’s one win.
    We can’t project anyone to be a +3 win player over two months of the season. That’s a +9 win pace for the season – for comparison, Pujols is +6 or +7 win player in any given year.

  2. dan says:

    I realize you like to use your new fielding system, but wouldn’t it be significantly better to use something that has hit location data available to it?

  3. dan says:

    Oh, and that Mark Teixeira video is hilarious

  4. Pizza Cutter says:

    An over-statement on his part (and a bad non-catch on my part… don’t write blog posts when you’re tired)but still, the sentiment is the same. Teixeira was the best hitter out there on the block unless the Red Sox actually deal Manny.

  5. tangotiger says:

    I did the analysis on my site, and it was as fair a trade as you’ll find.

  6. Pizza Cutter says:

    Tom, the problem with your analysis is that while the trade does project to even out in the long-term, the Braves should have charged some interest to the Angels. The Braves are giving the Angels the “money” (Teixeira) upfront in exchange for a promise that Kotchman and Marek will pay off in the future. The Braves were also in a position of strength in that they held the biggest chip left on the table. I fault them for not getting more based on that alone.

  7. dan says:

    Where is Tango’s analysis? I don’t see it anywhere on the blog… I searched “Teixeira Kotchman” in the search box for both the blog and and got nothing of use.

  8. Pizza Cutter says:

    It’s in the “in-season Sabermetric moves of 2008” post. The Tex/Kotchman analysis is somewhere around reply number 50 or so. Just search for Teixeira.

  9. dan says:

    jeez, that’s buried way down…

  10. Rally says:

    You really think the Braves should have asked for Brown or Morales?
    I wish they had, and the Angels kept Kotchman. That comment tells me you have no clue how severe the MLE adjustments are between SLC (extreme hitters park and league) and Anaheim.
    In 3 AAA seasons, Morales has hit 326/363/504 at ages 23-25. Brown at 24-25 has hit 301/362/551 there.
    Kotchman in AAA hit 319/381/482, about as good as Morales and just a bit behind Brown, but did that as a 21-22 year old. He’s also a far better defender.
    Rest assured that the Braves, at the very least, got the best 1B the Angels had.

  11. Pizza Cutter says:

    Sean, you’re right that I know very little about the minor leagues in general. It’s one of those things I have on my to-do list. I wasn’t aware that SLC had that kind of gradient on MLE’s. I stand corrected.
    I still think the Braves got screwed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: