Pitch Counts and Normalized Innings
June 29, 2005 6 Comments
More on pitching. A couple years ago, Joe Sheehan wrote an article about decreasing workloads for pitchers. He concluded that
“Whereas the task of pitching the entire game may have been a reasonable expectation for the first 30, 40, maybe 80 years of organized baseball, now it requires too many pitches thrown with too much effort.”
A problem that analysts have faced in comparing pitchers of yesteryear to today’s pitchers has been the problem of decreasing workloads. Cy Young pitched well over 7,000 innings; even today’s greatest horse, Roger Clemens, has thrown 3,000 innings less. But if we were to look at their pitch counts, we would probably see that the gap was much smaller than their innings pitched would suggest. The problem is that pitch count data is not available for the time we need it most: 100 years ago, when it took many fewer pitches to finish a game than it does now.
Thankfully, Tangotiger, one of the leaders in sabermetric analysis, has proposed a simple formula for estimating pitch counts:
3.3*PA + 1.5*SO + 2.2*BB
I’ve found that it correlates almost perfectly with actual pitch counts (r = .97), so this tool is very useful when trying to figure innings pitched based on pitch counts. What I did was, using the Lahman Database, estimate the number of pitches thrown by every pitcher in baseball history. Then, to translate that into modern innings, I divided by 170 and multiplied by 9 as I’ve found that the average game takes about 170 pitches nowadays.
Here is the modified career leader board:
|
nameLast |
nameFirst |
IP |
Pitches |
Tr.Inn |
|
Young |
Cy |
7354.7 |
106073 |
5616 |
|
Ryan |
Nolan |
5386 |
89217.5 |
4723 |
|
Galvin |
Pud |
6003.3 |
87620.2 |
4639 |
|
Johnson |
Walter |
5914.7 |
86633.8 |
4586 |
|
Niekro |
Phil |
5404.3 |
83826.9 |
4438 |
|
Carlton |
Steve |
5217.3 |
81790.5 |
4330 |
|
Perry |
Gaylord |
5350.3 |
80779.7 |
4277 |
|
Sutton |
Don |
5282.3 |
79697.9 |
4219 |
|
Spahn |
Warren |
5243.7 |
78134.4 |
4137 |
|
Blyleven |
Bert |
4970 |
76080.2 |
4028 |
|
Keefe |
Tim |
5047.7 |
75744.5 |
4010 |
|
Nichols |
Kid |
5056.3 |
75693.5 |
4007 |
|
Alexander |
Pete |
5190 |
74451.6 |
3942 |
|
Seaver |
Tom |
4782.7 |
72435.7 |
3835 |
|
Wynn |
Early |
4564 |
71452.4 |
3783 |
|
John |
Tommy |
4710.3 |
71120.9 |
3765 |
|
Clemens |
Roger |
4493 |
70835.4 |
3750 |
|
Kaat |
Jim |
4530.3 |
68843.4 |
3645 |
|
Roberts |
Robin |
4688.7 |
68794.1 |
3642 |
|
Mathewson |
Christy |
4780.7 |
68758.6 |
3640 |
Jenkins |
Fergie |
4500.7 |
67701.4 |
3584 |
|
Ruffing |
Red |
4344 |
67681.4 |
3583 |
|
Radbourn |
Charley |
4535.3 |
67073 |
3551 |
|
Rixey |
Eppa |
4494.7 |
66293.6 |
3510 |
|
Plank |
Eddie |
4495.7 |
65869.9 |
3487 |
|
Welch |
Mickey |
4802 |
65642.2 |
3475 |
|
Tanana |
Frank |
4188.3 |
65135.8 |
3448 |
|
Grimes |
Burleigh |
4179.7 |
64381.7 |
3408 |
|
Lyons |
Ted |
4161 |
62967.5 |
3334 |
|
Maddux |
Greg |
4181.3 |
62353.9 |
3301 |
|
Faber |
Red |
4086.7 |
62163.1 |
3291 |
|
Newsom |
Bobo |
3759.3 |
61274.5 |
3244 |
|
Feller |
Bob |
3827 |
61146.3 |
3237 |
|
Martinez |
Dennis |
3999.7 |
61074.7 |
3233 |
|
Grove |
Lefty |
3940.7 |
60899.3 |
3224 |
|
Gibson |
Bob |
3884.3 |
60639.1 |
3210 |
|
Hough |
Charlie |
3801.3 |
60567 |
3206 |
|
Jones |
Sam |
3883 |
60012.4 |
3177 |
|
Morris |
Jack |
3824 |
59971 |
3175 |
|
McCormick |
Jim |
4275.7 |
59921 |
3172 |
|
Palmer |
Jim |
3948 |
59371.8 |
3143 |
|
Koosman |
Jerry |
3839.3 |
59256.4 |
3137 |
|
Quinn |
Jack |
3920.3 |
58312.4 |
3087 |
|
Glavine |
Tom |
3740.3 |
58067.2 |
3074 |
|
Bunning |
Jim |
3760.3 |
58021.9 |
3072 |
|
Whitehill |
Earl |
3564.7 |
57296.7 |
3033 |
|
Hoyt |
Waite |
3762.3 |
57221.5 |
3029 |
|
Reuss |
Jerry |
3669.7 |
56760.5 |
3005 |
|
Lolich |
Mickey |
3638.3 |
56627.8 |
2998 |
|
Niekro |
Joe |
3584 |
55444.7 |
2935 |
While the overall order remains fairly similar, the innings become much more compressed (the standard deviation among the top-50 drops from 754 to 559). The difference between Cy Young and Roger Clemens becomes 1,000 innings smaller. It’s still huge, however, and that’s because while I have adjusted for pitch counts, I have not adjusted for the second part of the equation: that Young was able to throw pitches with lesser effort due to the substandard batters he generally faced. I have an idea of how to adjust for this, and when I look into it, I’ll present my findings, but for now, I just want to show just how pitch counts can impact innings pitched.
I’m interested to hear why the batters were substandard. Is it truly fair to hold against Cy Young the fact he did not play in a HR-happy era?
I think it’s a general axiom that the quality of competition in baseball has improved as scouting networks have broadened. Think about it this way: plenty of old-time pitchers have said that they would generally only throw 90% of what they could against most batters, trying their hardest against only the best. Nowadays, you never see pitchers holding back; they have to give it their all in each at-bat–batters are too good not to.
The better number should be around 150, not 170. There are about 3.75 pitches per batter, and about 40 batters per game.
Another way to think about it is that the average starter has almost 100 per start, with 6 innings per start. 100 per 6 is 150 per 9.
You are correct Tango. I noticed that my estimates were consistently low with 170. However, since this is actually a leaderboard in terms of pitches thrown, with innings only calculated to show a more familiar number, the leaderboard itself would not change.
8s4aGN rfgysdhezfbo, [url=http://suuvpdrykrdj.com/]suuvpdrykrdj[/url], [link=http://zouibydhogpa.com/]zouibydhogpa[/link], http://lksenrrtaatc.com/
8s4aGN rfgysdhezfbo, [url=http://suuvpdrykrdj.com/]suuvpdrykrdj[/url], [link=http://zouibydhogpa.com/]zouibydhogpa[/link], http://lksenrrtaatc.com/